<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:philipz85@hotmail.com" title="Yousuf Philips (jay) <philipz85@hotmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Yousuf Philips (jay)</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Bitmap section of Area tab missing control tooltips"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104413">bug 104413</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>WONTFIX
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Summary</td>
<td>Area tab: tooltips missing
</td>
<td>Bitmap section of Area tab missing control tooltips
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Bitmap section of Area tab missing control tooltips"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104413#c10">Comment # 10</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Bitmap section of Area tab missing control tooltips"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104413">bug 104413</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:philipz85@hotmail.com" title="Yousuf Philips (jay) <philipz85@hotmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Yousuf Philips (jay)</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=104413#c8">comment #8</a>)
<span class="quote">> Without clear explanation how a complex dialog is intended to work, the user
> will never know if a surprising or not understood behavior of the dialog is
> a bug or an erroneous use of it. That is a bad user experience and more work
> for the QA team.</span >
The old design definitely was complex, which even i struggled with when i first
used it, which is why it was redesigned to be alot more user friendly. If users
disagree with these changes, we are to hear them out and make changes
accordingly, but i doubt QA will get any more work about this than they would
have from the old design.
<span class="quote">> For the bitmap tab for example: Percents in a editable text-field which
> change magically when something else is modified by the user is a bad user
> experience when it is not clearly stated that these parameters are dependent
> and by which rule they are dependent.</span >
Users already understand that if they modify a field and it changes another
field, then these fields are related, like when they change the line spacing
preset field in the paragraph dialog or when they change the column width in
the table format dialog. Most users will select one of the available bitmap
size presets, which are similar presets they would have seen when they changed
their desktop wallpaper, and possibly change its alignment/position and thats
it, and you cant get any more simpler than that for this feature. Users who
want more control are given the ability to do so, and even they should find it
simple to use. And lets not forget that we have a preview to give the user
clear feedback on how any of their changes will change the outcome.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>