<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Add ability to automatically compress and resize images"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34133#c68">Comment # 68</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Add ability to automatically compress and resize images"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34133">bug 34133</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:cno@nouenoff.nl" title="Cor Nouws <cno@nouenoff.nl>"> <span class="fn">Cor Nouws</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Luke from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=34133#c67">comment #67</a>)
<span class="quote">> We are talking about DESTRUCTIVE EDITS. This assumption that it can just be
> "fixed", is only true if the user still has access to the original, notices
> it, and it aware of this backwards workflow. If users are familiar with
> ...</span >
Hé Luke,
I think there is agreement on your point that quality is important and that the
workflow must give users and organizations the control and clarity they need to
reach that. We must make sure to put that process in place very well.
IMO the ideas given here fit that purpose. Is there anything missing in your
opinion?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>