<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Enhancement request: Set default install folder under Windows to \LibreOffice\"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62303#c17">Comment # 17</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Enhancement request: Set default install folder under Windows to \LibreOffice\"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62303">bug 62303</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> <span class="fn">V Stuart Foote</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=62303#c16">comment #16</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=62303#c15">comment #15</a>)
> > But would think the LibreOffice user profile needs to drop the number
> > directory. Rather than the current awkward %APPDATA%\LibreOffice\4 (leftover
> > from the 3 -> 4 migration) it should become just %APPDATA%\LibreOffice, yes?
>
> No. We once decided to stick with "4" as long as there's no technical
> reason of incompatibility that would force us to switch to a different name.
> (We did so exactly to avoid migration issues. And anyway, at least
> technically, the issue of UserInstallation naming is unrelated to this bug.)</span >
Remember the discussion, but it didn't make sense to keep it then--and having
had it for all of the 5 builds (looking like an oversight though we know it was
not) maybe it is time for it to go? When crossing to 6 in 18 months, or do it
sooner if this is done for 5.4 or 5.5--either way is the directory necessary to
user profile?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>