<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Enhancement request: Set default install folder under Windows to \LibreOffice\" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62303#c17">Comment # 17</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Enhancement request: Set default install folder under Windows to \LibreOffice\" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62303">bug 62303</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=62303#c16">comment #16</a>) > (In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=62303#c15">comment #15</a>) > > But would think the LibreOffice user profile needs to drop the number > > directory. Rather than the current awkward %APPDATA%\LibreOffice\4 (leftover > > from the 3 -> 4 migration) it should become just %APPDATA%\LibreOffice, yes? > > No. We once decided to stick with "4" as long as there's no technical > reason of incompatibility that would force us to switch to a different name. > (We did so exactly to avoid migration issues. And anyway, at least > technically, the issue of UserInstallation naming is unrelated to this bug.) Remember the discussion, but it didn't make sense to keep it then--and having had it for all of the 5 builds (looking like an oversight though we know it was not) maybe it is time for it to go? When crossing to 6 in 18 months, or do it sooner if this is done for 5.4 or 5.5--either way is the directory necessary to user profile?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>