<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Default red font color and yellow highlight color no long in default color palette" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107731#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Default red font color and yellow highlight color no long in default color palette" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107731">bug 107731</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:philipz85@hotmail.com" title="Yousuf Philips (jay) <philipz85@hotmail.com>"> Yousuf Philips (jay)</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107731#c1">comment #1</a>) > Would be nice to have color names for default options. So we should change > the picker to fff200 and the other. Seems they are assigned based on a color name variable. So i checked to make sure compatibility wont be affected, and LO will export fff200 yellow as ffff00 yellow when saving to .docx, but previously saved .odt which used ffff00 yellow will experience slight issues of previous highlights looking different than new highlights. (In reply to Maxim Monastirsky from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107731#c3">comment #3</a>) > <a href="http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/svx/source/tbxctrls/tbxcolorupdate">http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/svx/source/tbxctrls/tbxcolorupdate</a>. > cxx#41 So i guess the best option is to create new red and yellow entries that correspond to the new palette in <a href="http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/include/tools/colordata.hxx">http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/include/tools/colordata.hxx</a>, rather than modifying the existing COL_RED and COL_YELLOW values. Right?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>