<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Better handling for multiline tabs"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99528#c10">Comment # 10</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Better handling for multiline tabs"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99528">bug 99528</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:philipz85@hotmail.com" title="Yousuf Philips (jay) <philipz85@hotmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Yousuf Philips (jay)</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Thomas Lendo from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=99528#c9">comment #9</a>)
<span class="quote">> Most people are used to read LTR or RTL, not top to bottom or reverse.</span >
The contents of the tabs are ordered top to bottom in columns.
<span class="quote">> Also there is much more horizontal than vertical space.</span >
That all depends on how the controls are organized. Many tabs have extra wide
controls for no reason (e.g. Character dialog's hyperlink and highlighting
tabs, nearly every tabs in the Paragraph dialog)
<span class="quote">> Using a scrollbar would be a usability disaster. A vertical layout should only
> be an option for very few (~handful) points.</span >
Cant say i agree with you, as when you have content that is larger than the
available space, scrollbars are common and useful (e.g. browser, file manager).
Alternatively you would have to have more vertical tabs, but you wouldnt be for
scrolling within the vertical tabs.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>