<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Improve shortcut key list for German keyboard layout" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82117#c11">Comment # 11</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Improve shortcut key list for German keyboard layout" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82117">bug 82117</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:harald.koester@mail.de" title="Harald Koester <harald.koester@mail.de>"> Harald Koester</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=82117#c8">comment #8</a>) > > Being not a fan of combinations with function keys. For example, it's > heavily used in KDE/Plasma (actually Kwin). For increase/decrease a common > shortcut is ctrl++/- (Internet browsers, PDF viewers etc). Execute a macro, > adding some unusual break etc. shouldn't be assigned to a shortcut at all > (free to customize by users). Same for Calc features. So in my opinion we > solve one problem but run into another. The intention of the initial report was it, to have the same possibilities respective shortcuts with a German keyboard compared with a Standard US keyboard. Hence new shortcuts are not added, they already exist and can be used with a US keyboard. Furthermore I agree with you that there are deficiencies respective shortcuts: Not all functions are described, some shortcuts are defined for functions which are used seldom and the shortcut list of the help and the user guide differs in some points. And also the problem with different keyboards exists not only with German keyboards. But this all needs time and a major revision. If this is intended in short term, it would be good. If not, to my opinion at least the initial problem with German keyboards should be solved first.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>