<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [META] Issues related to malformed jpg images" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108150#c1">Comment # 1</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [META] Issues related to malformed jpg images" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108150">bug 108150</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:thomas.lendo@gmail.com" title="Thomas Lendo <thomas.lendo@gmail.com>"> Thomas Lendo</a> <pre>Telesto, thanks for your effort. But is this tracking bug necessary? (Also the name isn't very expressive.) Only <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Improve handling of JPEG images that have no defined units, LO mishandles the import into calc" href="show_bug.cgi?id=96178">bug 96178</a> seems to fit into this jpeg bug. The other bugs are already or should be listed in Writer Images meta bug and/or Compression meta bug. For meta bugs with few sub-bugs we get squashed by the QA team. You should think about reassigning sub-bugs to other tracking bugs if not already assigned and closing this bug.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>