<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Paragraph inside a table cannot be given the formatting property "Page break before"" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108233#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Paragraph inside a table cannot be given the formatting property "Page break before"" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108233">bug 108233</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tony.g2@vif.com" title="tony.g2@vif.com">tony.g2@vif.com</a> <pre>(In reply to Regina Henschel from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108233#c6">comment #6</a>) > So Word too does not insert a page break for arbitrary paragraphs, but only > for exact one situation. And the case "first paragraph in first column" > would fit exactly to a page break defined on a row. The ODF specification > allows a page break setting for a row, but only LibreOffice has not > implemented it. > > After this basic it implemented, the filters for Word documents can be > extended to "translate" between the different descriptions of the same > behavior. (My last .odt attachment can be ignored. I had not seen the replies posted at about the same time.) Good explanation. So the filter would translate: "page break before" on "first paragraph in first column" in row N (.doc file) to "page break on a row" on row N (.odt file). I am not aware of any other case in a .doc file that would translate to the same target. So it seems that the reverse translation is also possible without ambiguity. I have not yet checked if this translation is unambiguous (one to one mapping) in later versions of Word and .docx files.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>