<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Enhancement request scale image to fit to margins and keep aspect ratio" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107874#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Enhancement request scale image to fit to margins and keep aspect ratio" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107874">bug 107874</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:1000dead@gmail.com" title="1000dead <1000dead@gmail.com>"> 1000dead</a> <pre>(In reply to Buovjaga from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107874#c3">comment #3</a>) > (In reply to 1000dead from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107874#c2">comment #2</a>) > > I disagree. Its a simple expansion of an image to page margin while keeping > > the aspect ratio. This should not need a macro or extension. > > The point is not how simple it is or what you feel about its importance > personally. We have to limit the amount of specialised features in order to > not clutter the interface to an overwhelming mess. This is why macros and > extensions exist - anyone can create a custom tool for their highly > specialised task. > > Sure, we can ping the UX team about this so we can settle this in a more > public arena. The only thing I am disagreeing with, is referring to wanting to expand and image to page constraints as being "a highly specialised task". It just isn't. I am not disagreeing with whether it is easy or hard to implement or whether there is enough room in the UI to add a command, that's a decision for the developers. I only asked "would it be possible?" if it is not, then I will leave it at that. Thank you Buovjaga</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>