<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Calc fails to correctly identify the font used in a cell and fails to obey format and font changes" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108041#c15">Comment # 15</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Calc fails to correctly identify the font used in a cell and fails to obey format and font changes" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108041">bug 108041</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:timbacontent@gmail.com" title="Kevin <timbacontent@gmail.com>"> Kevin</a> <pre>(In reply to Buovjaga from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108041#c14">comment #14</a>) Did you try my new file? I briefly experimented with substituting Prestige Elite for Courier New because I thought it might work better for the b and # symbols, but I abandoned the idea and have removed all instances of Prestige Elite from my document. Only a small fraction of the cells ever had prestige elite applied to them. The cells I copied to create the new attachment (<a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=134126">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=134126</a>) never had Prestige Elite as far as I know. I don't understand the approach to this bug. Why does the history of the document matter. I would expect Calc to be able to open any .xlsx or .ods and "cleanse" each cell of any strange headers or xml or whatever other kind of coding and put them into the clean orderly format that Calc expects to see when it creates its own document. The ability to open pre-existing Excel files without corrupting them has got to be near the top of the list of requirements</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>