<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Read-only bar is unreadable when using dark theme" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103656#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Read-only bar is unreadable when using dark theme" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103656">bug 103656</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:rq@akl.lt" title="Rimas Kudelis <rq@akl.lt>"> Rimas Kudelis</a> <pre>Thank you for marking this bug UNCONFIRMED. Of course, the original reporter confirming it over multiple versions doesn't count. Noo, why would it count, really? And of course, the LibreOffice QA team does not have resources of even one person to confirm this really trivial bug (all you have to do is switch on a dark GTK theme, even if just for a little while, and open a document from your e-mail, which triggers it being seen as read-only). What I don't understand is why you ask the original reporter to revisit the issues they file and "confirm" them by marking them UNCONFIRMED. Why should I be putting more effort into this than the QA team is putting?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>