<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Wrong Behaviour if You Try to Edit a Template which is Read-Only" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103619#c10">Comment # 10</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Wrong Behaviour if You Try to Edit a Template which is Read-Only" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103619">bug 103619</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:baron@caesar.elte.hu" title="Aron Budea <baron@caesar.elte.hu>"> Aron Budea</a> <pre>(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103619#c9">comment #9</a>) > When you open a document that is already open somewhere else, you are given > the option to open it read-only or open it for editing. When a user chooses > to edit a template, that is the only thing he wants to do, so he doesnt care > if the template is set to read-only or in a path he doesnt have write access > to, he wants to edit it, so there isnt a need to have multiple edit labels > based on the user's access to the file. I do think the information that the template is editable in-place or not is important. Not because it alters the user action, but because it's a relevant piece of detail: they can't actually edit the template, only a copy of it.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>