<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Too small bullet size confuses the user" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108925#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Too small bullet size confuses the user" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108925">bug 108925</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:zolnaitamas2000@gmail.com" title="Tamás Zolnai <zolnaitamas2000@gmail.com>"> Tamás Zolnai</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108925#c3">comment #3</a>) > Sane constraints make always sense and the 25% suggestion sounds good to me. > Besides this I don't understand the use case of an option to tweak the size > in addition to different characters (large and small bullets). A feature > that is restricted to Impress too. I see this option reasonable. That's true for some bullet characters there are two sizes (small and large), but I guess it's not true for all symbols. If you select a custom symbol (for example an arrow), it is useful that you can specify its size. This Impress-only setting might come from the different usage of text. I mean in Impress there isn't a general text flow, but text is always inside some text box. In text boxes it might be useful to use relative sizes, since in this way if you change the font (for example to fit in the current text box) of the text the bullet size will follow it. This difference is there in MS Office too.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>