<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Mistranslation in French" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109117#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Mistranslation in French" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109117">bug 109117</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:gautier.sophie@gmail.com" title="sophie <gautier.sophie@gmail.com>"> sophie</a> <pre>(In reply to French Language Coordinator from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=109117#c4">comment #4</a>) > "Saisie semi-automatique" définit une fonction qui permet à l'utilisateur > d'entrer uniquement les premiers caractères d'un champ déjà tapée > précédemment et d'obtenir automatiquement le contenu du champ. > > It is much longer, yes, but could be something else. Like any good > translation, thoughts have to go into it. Quality does not always come easy. So what is your proposal? what for other identical strings in the UI? > > > The fact that a translation has been wrong one way or another for years > cannot possibly be a reason not to correct it. This kind of logic implies > that if a coding bug has been present for such a long time that users are > now used to the buggy behaviour, then it shouldn't be corrected. > > A discussion needs to be open to get anywhere, and the result of a true > resolution process, not a unilateral decision between your and your > colleague. My colleague as you said and me are translating UI and help of this product since more than 17 years, so yes as doers, we will discuss it together and make a decision how we think this translation is best. Sophie</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>