<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - UI: right-click in "Options/Paths" to open folder in file manager" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92969#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - UI: right-click in "Options/Paths" to open folder in file manager" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92969">bug 92969</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tietze.heiko@gmail.com" title="Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com>"> Heiko Tietze</a> <pre>Created <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=134792" name="attach_134792" title="Mockup for a streamlined version">attachment 134792</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=134792&action=edit" title="Mockup for a streamlined version">[details]</a> Mockup for a streamlined version Double-click works as expected and opens the path for tmp, downloads, images, classification (different dialog), backup. But not the other, likely because you can have multiple entries there. (WFM to this point) In this case the best solution is to provide the same behavior in the edit dialog meaning double-click on one of the radio buttons opens the file manager. That's the simple solution and could be an easyhack. But actually I would prefer a more consistent interaction. Double-click is normally the default interaction, and that's Edit here. With a context menu we could give access to the file manager. You can copy the selected path via ctrl+C or context menu in the edit dialog (only there because of the multiple paths); users may expect to paste and edit but I'd keep the dialog clean and list Edit only with in the context menu. Another non-standard behavior is the use of radio button to select the default path. My suggestion is to use the sequence for prioritization, with up/down buttons to sort the items. (In reply to tommy27 from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92969#c2">comment #2</a>) > just a polite ping about this old enhancement request I filed exactly 2 > years ago. Sorry for the delay. > is this something that the UX-team would like to implement? The UX folks do not implement. But your request is valid, removing needsUX.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>