<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Option to revert to old Pop-Up edit method for Input Fields" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79877#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Option to revert to old Pop-Up edit method for Input Fields" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79877">bug 79877</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>(In reply to Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=79877#c11">comment #11</a>) > == Suggestion: == > As you can reach the "Edit Field" dialog via the context menu, we should > change the double click action to open the "old" dialog instead. > > Would you be ok with this solution? Yes it would be reasonable to change double click action the open "old" Input Fields dialog (rather than the Edit Fields dialog). But the "old" dialog (currently reached with F9_SHIFT_MOD1) needs refactoring that would make it suitable to task: 1.) "old" dialog's default is to now position at the start (the first text:text-input field) in the document. Instead the dialog should open positioned to the field with cursor focus and the double-click originates. 2.) the "old" dialog needs a Previous button action to complement the Next button. In other words logic to allow movement in both directions through fields of the form--currently it is one way sequential from start of form.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>