<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - LibreOffice unable to correctly handle regular font weights/styles on Mac" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254#c26">Comment # 26</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - LibreOffice unable to correctly handle regular font weights/styles on Mac" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254">bug 69254</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:kalle@goodtimes.fi" title="ikjt <kalle@goodtimes.fi>"> ikjt</a> <pre>The freely available Overpass typeface from Red Hat has enough weights (8 plus italics) to clearly demonstrate the problem. <a href="http://overpassfont.org/">http://overpassfont.org/</a> What happens with typefaces like this is that some of the weights will fail to show up in the font selector in LO. And of those that do show up, some will randomly produce the wrong weight. Testing just now, I'm missing "Extra Light" and "Heavy" entirely. "Thin" and "Light" both produce the the same weight. As another example, I have the commercial typeface Akagi in a five-weight configuration. The heaviest one (Ultra) will not show up in LO. Using the second-heaviest (Extra Bold) actually produces Ultra instead. Disabling Ultra in Font Book makes Extra Bold work correctly.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>