<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:cno@nouenoff.nl" title="Cor Nouws <cno@nouenoff.nl>"> <span class="fn">Cor Nouws</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Clone formatting appends copied formatting rather than overwriting applied formatting"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71481">bug 71481</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Keywords</td>
<td>regression
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Clone formatting appends copied formatting rather than overwriting applied formatting"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71481#c19">Comment # 19</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Clone formatting appends copied formatting rather than overwriting applied formatting"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71481">bug 71481</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:cno@nouenoff.nl" title="Cor Nouws <cno@nouenoff.nl>"> <span class="fn">Cor Nouws</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Thanks Mike for the examples.
I tend to warn for the use of Clone Formatting. It's easy to use, but there is
a good chance that the result is a mess, from maintenance / style point of
view.
Limiting the chance to mess up with styles could be done by restricting the use
to only clone direct formatting. Now that will make users wonder too what is
happening. OTOH, do people that use it, know about styles? So why worry.. yes,
if you have to work with a document from someone who uses that tool.
I wouldn't know a consistent solution at the moment to make all happy here.
Removing 'regression' keyword</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>