<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Auto double side printing option is lacking" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Auto double side printing option is lacking" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575">bug 111575</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:cno@nouenoff.nl" title="Cor Nouws <cno@nouenoff.nl>"> Cor Nouws</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=111575#c5">comment #5</a>) > From the UX perspective there is nothing to say against a checkbox next to > reverse order, disabled when the printer is not capable of duplex. Sure - but I would say the interesting part is to read the printer drivers capabilities. To an extend that it's a far reach for LibreOffice. Looking at a generic Windows print dialog (2012, <a href="https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms646964(v=vs.85).aspx">https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms646964(v=vs.85).aspx</a>) there is no duplex too.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>