<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Useless Arrow Style settings for shape objects" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111728#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Useless Arrow Style settings for shape objects" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111728">bug 111728</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:zolnaitamas2000@gmail.com" title="Tamás Zolnai <zolnaitamas2000@gmail.com>"> Tamás Zolnai</a> <pre>(In reply to Buovjaga from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=111728#c2">comment #2</a>) > (In reply to Regina Henschel from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=111728#c1">comment #1</a>) > > Please compare with <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Arrowheads in sidebar are disabled, although object can carry arrowheads." href="show_bug.cgi?id=101254">bug 101254</a>. I think, that it would be to expensive, if > > you examine the enhanced geometry of a custom shape to decide, whether the > > path is closed, only for to show or hide this setting. Therefore I suggest > > to have line ends always enabled. > > Tamás: do you agree? I'm not sure we need actually examine the geometry for decide on allowing the arrow. I mean when you insert a rectangle shape you know that it is a closed geometry, so I guess for the preset shapes we might have additional clue about the type of the shape and decide based on that. Additionally I see that this arrow styles settings are also available for textbox and image shapes, which are clearly have different shape type (not custom shapes), so there I'm sure we can disable these settings without a problem.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>