<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Save not active after links updated"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91345#c24">Comment # 24</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Save not active after links updated"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91345">bug 91345</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:gmmellina@inwind.it" title="gmarco <gmmellina@inwind.it>"> <span class="fn">gmarco</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Buovjaga from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91345#c23">comment #23</a>)
<span class="quote">>
> Yes, I can reproduce. Indeed, I first have to manually modify the links to
> match my own location. Then I can do a new round of modifying the .ods
> contents, opening the .odt, clicking Yes to update and it does not ask me to
> save.
> </span >
Happy to finally read that.
Happy to read in another bug that Cor Nouws has my same opinion ("To me, by the
way, it is more natural that a file asks to be saved, after links are
updated").
Further, about point 3) in my <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91345#c22">comment #22</a>, considering the matter quite
relevant, do you prefer I open an explicit enhancement request bug?
Please consider what it's like to open a document by keeping it up to date (it
is not so, but I do not know as I'm not warned) and continue unknowingly in the
job (saving and perhaps distributing to others the document considered to be up
to date) and only after n time find out the damage!</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>