<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - rewrite mysql connector to use mariadb client library"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46259#c31">Comment # 31</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - rewrite mysql connector to use mariadb client library"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46259">bug 46259</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:lionel@mamane.lu" title="Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>"> <span class="fn">Lionel Elie Mamane</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Julien Nabet from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=46259#c28">comment #28</a>)
<span class="quote">> Just to be sure.
> Now here's the chain:
> SDBC part: <LO core>/mysqlc
> -> MySql C++ connector : <LO core>/external/mysql-connector-cpp
> -> MariaDB C connector : <LO core>/external/mariadb-connector-c
>
> 1) Is it right?</span >
yes
<span class="quote">> 2) Have we still got license pb?</span >
yes, at the MySQL C++ connector level
<span class="quote">> 3) Do we want to rewrite SDBC part to directly call MariaDB C connector as
> zaxebo indicated in previous comment?</span >
<shrug>
If we have a *qualified* volunteer willing to essentially replicate MySQL C++
connector (modulo a few corner cases, that is what the work would be, because
MySQL C++ connector and SDBC are nearly the same API, both being a C++-isation
of JDBC), do it without introducing too many bugs, etc... sure, we take
patches.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>