<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Bundle and use open source Hebrew fonts by default" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113538#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Bundle and use open source Hebrew fonts by default" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113538">bug 113538</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:eyalroz@technion.ac.il" title="Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>"> Eyal Rozenberg</a> <pre>(In reply to Shai Berger from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=113538#c8">comment #8</a>) > In Israel, as far as I'm aware, it is at least an order of magnitude lower > (could find no data, which to me indicates that the userbase is insignificant). The fact that there are no statistics on LO usage does not suggest the userbase is insignificant. But I agree that the LO usage share is almost certainly lower for Hebrew-speakers than for other languages. But the share is pretty small also in other countries. > My point is: We (the Hebrew community) need to put much greater emphasis on > first-time users than the world community does. I don't think your conclusion follows from what you've presented, because LO's user share is very small for other languages as well, meaning that they too must emphasize attractiveness to new users. Which brings me to my second point: You're assuming that users' experience with a Word Processor is essentially writing on screen, but in fact their experience involves writing, printing and using the printed document, with the latter being the salient parts of the experience. For this reason it's important, IMO, to choose a font family which looks well in print while being reasonably pleasant on screen; and that's the case both for English and for Hebrew.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>