<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FORMATTING: Export and gallery re-import is spoiled using emf, wmf, svg formats" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94363#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FORMATTING: Export and gallery re-import is spoiled using emf, wmf, svg formats" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94363">bug 94363</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mbox.789@posteo.org" title="Tom <mbox.789@posteo.org>"> Tom</a> <pre>Buovjaga, I appreciate the excellent work of the Document Foundation and its development team to provide and continuously improve the LibreOffice suite. In fact, I use LibreOffice very often. This is the reason, why I have already donated to LibreOffice and plan donations also in the future. This is also the reason, why I report issues that I consider to be significant and generally beneficial to the entire LO community. Bugzilla used by the Document Foundation is an effective tool to systematically report and track all issues of LO. I understand that especially the users of LO are responsible to clearly report any new issue so that it can be reproduced and fixed by the development team. Likewise, I expect the development team to be responsible to comment any issue that has been discarded or fixed and close these issues afterwards. However, a 25% rate of silently fixed issues suggests that the second part of the tracking process is not as effective as one would expect. I think, rather than asking the original reporters of any open issue that is older than a year to check, if the corresponding issue was resolved (by chance), it would be better to find out, why a significant rate of resolved issues is not tracked (i.e. is silently fixed). Given the root cause of this significant rate, there is the chance to make the entire bug tracking process more efficient. Regards Tom</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>