<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Store rotation anchor per object" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113129#c18">Comment # 18</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Store rotation anchor per object" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113129">bug 113129</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:todventtu@suomi24.fi" title="Buovjaga <todventtu@suomi24.fi>"> Buovjaga</a> <pre>(In reply to Ljiljan from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=113129#c17">comment #17</a>) > Oh... I didn't know that this is expected workflow. Can't find an example of > how this could be useful to someone, but I guess it is. Talking from my > experience, because of this I usually have extra clicks. > > Microsoft Office 2007 has green circle above object, and if you decide to > rotate objects, no such workflow. Similar to WPS office and SoftOffice > Maker. Object is always rotated around its own center with significantly > less number of clicking. > > However, if we want to keep both features maybe we can introduce two toolbar > items: "Rotate object" and "Rotate around fixed center" Regarding number of clicks, you can rotate an object without activating the Rotate tool by clicking on it again after selecting it. Ie. you alternate between the resizing handles and rotation handles by a single click. So it's one extra click compared to your proposal. I'm not saying your proposal is bad: it is probably the more common use case to want to jump from object to object (and my <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=113129#c10">comment 10</a> was a mistake in this regard). I just think some people might be relying on this feature and would start complaining, if we did not offer some convenient replacement.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>