<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Shrinking of grow/shrink custom animation effect does not work" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108450#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Shrinking of grow/shrink custom animation effect does not work" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108450">bug 108450</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Katarina.Behrens@cib.de" title="Katarina Behrens (CIB) <Katarina.Behrens@cib.de>"> Katarina Behrens (CIB)</a> <pre>Unfortunately I don't see the new extended UI for tweaking growth and shrink dimensions to be production-ready any time soon, so I've fixed at least the part where shrinking the object (tiny & small) actually works. However, this makes me wonder: > An unscaled shape has a scale value of 1. > > With the UI in LO 3.5.4.2 a setting of "vertical tiny" is written as > smil:by="0,0.25". The result is, that the new scale becomes 1.0+0.0=1.0 in > x-direction and 1.0+0.25=1.25 in y-direction. The value of the > scale-attribute is a factor, so the resulting shape is 125% of the original > shape in vertical direction. > The correct value for getting a shape which is shrunken to 25% of the > original size in vertical direction would be smil:by="0,-0.75". How would a case when the shape would grow to 150% of its original size be written? Currently it is saved as smil:by="1.5, 1.5" but using the above formula, this results in 1 + 1.5 = 2.5 i.e 250% growth, which feels wrong ... would smil:by="0.5, 0.5" be the correct value?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>