<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Remove color palettes Breeze, Tango and LibreOffice" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113858#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Remove color palettes Breeze, Tango and LibreOffice" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113858">bug 113858</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:thomas.lendo@gmail.com" title="Thomas Lendo <thomas.lendo@gmail.com>"> Thomas Lendo</a> <pre>(In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=113858#c5">comment #5</a>) > I strongly disagree with this fashion to remove existing functionalities > under the pretext that they are used by less than 100% of the users. Same could be asked in discussions about specific feature removal e.g. in the wiki. It's the decision of ESC or a group of developers regardless who or how many people are actually using a feature. I'm also against hasty feature removal because only some people pretend to know that a feature is useless. BUT I haven't read/found any single explanation who the users are who need these palettes. For every single enhancement request in Bugzilla, people ask for whom this enhancement would be a benefit and if it can be better added as extension instead of in-built. Is this question not allowed for specific palettes? > Please describe the gain for: > 1/ existing normal users Normal users don't use Breeze color palette I really assume. Do normal users use another palette than "standard"? > 2/ advanced users and contributers LibreOffice help/marketing documents already have the used colors in their documents. Why is an extra LibreOffice color palette necessary? And if it's necessary because of some LibO marketing documents, why all the millions of LibO users must have this palette in their installation too? > 3/ new users willing to discover what possibilities LibreOffice can offer What possibilities are Breeze, Tango and LibreOffice color palettes offering to users? > Please give numbers proving that "Other palettes give normal users enough > choices" and that "palettes are only interesting for few people" Changing the whole default color palettes some LibO versions ago was no problem? But now it is a problem to remove the smallest palettes? > Please attach to this bug report an extension enabling the palette you want > to remove. With <a href="https://extensions.libreoffice.org/extensions/custom-palette-eport">https://extensions.libreoffice.org/extensions/custom-palette-eport</a> you can make a palette extension. It will be no problem for me or Jay or Heiko to make such extensions for the removed palettes. Extensions should be offered for these palettes indeed. > and, as for dictionaries, a menu entry must be added to search > new palettes on the extensions website. Right. Why didn't that happen long before when the palette extension possibility was added to LibO?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>