<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED INVALID - LibreOffice Vanilla does not recognize existing JDK installation" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114026#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED INVALID - LibreOffice Vanilla does not recognize existing JDK installation" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114026">bug 114026</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:iplaw67@tuta.io" title="Alex Thurgood <iplaw67@tuta.io>"> Alex Thurgood</a> <pre>(In reply to Adolfo Jayme from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=114026#c4">comment #4</a>) > Apple’s App Store explicitly forbids software using runtimes like Java. That > is why it’s disabled in the Vanilla builds. > > <a href="http://appleinsider.com/articles/10/10/20/">http://appleinsider.com/articles/10/10/20/</a> > apple_issues_review_guidelines_for_mac_app_store.html The point is that it doesn't mention any of this on the AppStore page itself. What good is referring to a LibreOffice page for which a link isn't even available on the AppStore page ? If this is how Vanilla bug reports are going to be handled, then frankly it isn't even worth the time for me to invest in reporting them. I would add that the AppStore accepts paying apps such as SweetHome 3D which includes a full Oracle JDK (<a href="http://www.sweethome3d.com/fr/download.jsp">http://www.sweethome3d.com/fr/download.jsp</a>), so clearly the link referred to has either got its sources wrong or is out of date.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>