<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - A new default set of bundled fonts" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103080#c26">Comment # 26</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - A new default set of bundled fonts" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103080">bug 103080</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:michael.meeks@collabora.com" title="Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@collabora.com>"> Michael Meeks</a> <pre>On the other comments I have no particular view -but- removing fonts from the install-set is in generally a -really- terrible idea. As such - we should be -extremely- careful wrt. adding fonts - since then people only seem to clamor to remove them later. Wrt. removing Liberation - the Liberation set is a vital part of our interoperability story, since they are metrically compatible with Ariel and Times New Roman - which form an important part of a vast set of documents. The ESC discussed this - we can discuss it again if there are some more presentable facts. Some of the fonts being removed it was claimed were un-maintained and probably under-used. Any hard data on their popularity to inform the decisions much appreciated. For myself - I'd far prefer to not remove old fonts, than to add new ones if space is the concern =)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>