<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - A new default set of bundled fonts"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103080#c27">Comment # 27</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - A new default set of bundled fonts"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103080">bug 103080</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tietze.heiko@gmail.com" title="Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Heiko Tietze</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Yannick.D from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103080#c25">comment #25</a>)
<span class="quote">> I would argue for a more fundamental reorganization of bundled fonts
> including discussing default templates (and maybe couple it with a font
> downloader "addition"). As was the initial scope of this report. A future
> goal could be to only ship one set of very high quality fonts for each
> language/character set which are used by default templates. And to give
> users an easy way to download missing fonts which are than handled by the OS.</span >
Absolutely. Take a look at
<a href="https://design.blog.documentfoundation.org/2016/11/11/additions-to-libreoffice/">https://design.blog.documentfoundation.org/2016/11/11/additions-to-libreoffice/</a>
and
<a href="https://design.blog.documentfoundation.org/2016/10/21/dealing-with-missing-fonts/">https://design.blog.documentfoundation.org/2016/10/21/dealing-with-missing-fonts/</a></pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>