<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - A new default set of bundled fonts" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103080#c21">Comment # 21</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - A new default set of bundled fonts" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103080">bug 103080</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ya.della@gmail.com" title="Yannick.D <ya.della@gmail.com>"> Yannick.D</a> <pre>I‘m not against removing fonts in general. But why is Source Sans/Code now being removed? They have only been mentioned in the context of Ubuntu packaging. How is that an argument? Its one of the most sophisticated open source fonts projects. Why remove it without discussion? For a gain of 2MB?! This thread started as a promising and structured discussion about bundled fonts but the result is completely intransparent to me. - Why keep Gentium Book? (Or even Gentium if others are removed?) - Why don't replace Libertine/Biolinum Graphite versions with OTF? What about its display cut? - Why keep all those DejaVu fonts? (Which are also rather similar to Noto…) - …</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>