<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - A new default set of bundled fonts" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103080#c30">Comment # 30</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - A new default set of bundled fonts" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103080">bug 103080</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:michael.meeks@collabora.com" title="Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@collabora.com>"> Michael Meeks</a> <pre>Hi Yannik: > Interoperability is of course very valuable to most users so bundling > those fonts is probably a good idea. My point was more towards that there's > no need have metrically identical to anything fonts as LOs own default. If by default we create documents that hard-code fonts that are not available (or have no metrically compatible version) on the majority platform - we really hurt our users' ability to save in eg. PPTX and be reasonably sure that the slides look at least similar on the other side of the divide. That would be a problem (to me). We could of course use the newer Google C* compatible fonts Carlito and/or Caladea - but I see these as the only other option for default fonts in our bundled templates etc.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>