<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - New standard palette: names of purple and violet are switched" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114719#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - New standard palette: names of purple and violet are switched" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114719">bug 114719</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>Purple and Violet are kind of a mess, as Jay shows reversing the columns would not work--we've got a really bad base color for both in the standard.soc--but then most of the base colors are off Hue. We are bouncing all over the hues of the RGB additive color wheel. How theoretically correct should the standard.soc be? None the less, we've set Purple to HSV (268°, 69%, 57%) and Violet to HSV (310°, 79%, 64%). The RGB additive color theory suggests we have this wrong if we accept the Wikipedia definitions: Purple: RGB #800080 (128, 0, 128), HSV (300°, 100%, 50%) Violet: RGB #7F00FF (128, 0, 255), HSV (270°, 100%, 100%) Woring with RGB HSV/B -- the Violet(s) should be out the 270° radial, and the Purple(s) out the 300° "Magenta" radial. And build a We do pickup the 270° color hue for Violet in the tonal.soc--matching theory at the 68% saturation, but interestingly in the html.soc the X11/HTML/SVG Violet is out the 300° radial with most of the "Purple, violet, and magenta colors".</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>