<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Forms and reports hang" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113937#c42">Comment # 42</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Forms and reports hang" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113937">bug 113937</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:RPeters52@gmail.com" title="Ralph Peters <RPeters52@gmail.com>"> Ralph Peters</a> <pre>(In reply to Julien Nabet from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=113937#c40">comment #40</a>) > I didn't read the whole part but just some remarks: > 1) > About gdb traces: > first one doesn't show bt just some running but perhaps it was on purpose > second one shows "??" and, as Alex indicated, must correspond to Java part. > It should indeed be fixed but for the moment, just type "c" to keep on and > fetch the real bt. > third one displays nothing except the real gdb trace is in gdbtrace.log > > 2) > About hsqldb version > I hope you don't try to mix versions because it could corrupt your db. > Indeed, LO uses hsqldb 1.8.0 so if you use 2.4 even to experiment... > > 3) > It seems we still need a step by step process to reproduce this with a small > db. > > 4) > as you're very experienced, I wonder if you'd be interested in building LO > code, see <a href="https://www.libreoffice.org/community/developers/">https://www.libreoffice.org/community/developers/</a> > Indeed, most of the LO code is in C++ (I'd say at least 90%?). > It would allow you to: > - not search some debug packages > - to choose your build options > - try to add some specific debug traces > ... > but I'll stop here since I won't teach you anything here :-) > Of course you need a good connection since LO code is quite big and some > patience to build (depending on your machine obviously and your build > options) > but once it's done, you can really experiment. Hi, I am using hysqldb 2.4 only with my split database see: <a href="https://www.mediafire.com/file/59iq0esx071zcic/Split_HSQLDB_Wizard_v3c.odb?ssl=1">https://www.mediafire.com/file/59iq0esx071zcic/Split_HSQLDB_Wizard_v3c.odb?ssl=1</a> for a bit of background on my setup. So, I do not think that there is any problem with having both 2.4 and 1.8, as 1.8 is used only for the embedded database. IMPORTANT BTW, I have been using my split database since about 12/15/2017 and have had no hanging/crashing problems at all. I have more than 30 hours of using it and entering data. I have had some "fun" making it do the right thing (like auto-incrementing keys in tables) but I have fixed my particular problems. I miss being able to modify database tables after they are in use. (Yes, I can setup a new one, copy-paste data and then delete the old one.) But the rock-solid stability makes these annoyances a very minor problem. So, I am interested in spending my limited time, particularly on the computer, working instead of chasing bugs. I would seriously suggest that "official" and updated documents be written for Base concerning CONVERTING an embedded database to a split one. Currently, there are a number of sources (SEE ATTACHED PDF) that are from different dates. I would also suggest that NO ONE use an embedded database because of the numerous problems discussed in various forums and articles on the web. Ralph Peters</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>