<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - New standard palette: names of purple and violet are switched" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114719#c16">Comment # 16</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - New standard palette: names of purple and violet are switched" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114719">bug 114719</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>Created <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=138766" name="attach_138766" title="original RYB palette with modern names">attachment 138766</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=138766&action=edit" title="original RYB palette with modern names">[details]</a> original RYB palette with modern names (In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=114719#c15">comment #15</a>) > > So were you picking RGB from the image, or were they directly computed? > > They were picked directly from the image. OK so that is a technical issue with the colors--and using the the generator directly would result in a more correct rendering of a RYB palette--but at this point the only actual "error" is our labeling of Magenta as "Violet". Look at the attached image, the Indigo scale is correctly also know as Violet. Fixing this we would leave the RGB Hex values as are, but need to change all the standard.soc Violet names to Magenta... and would also need to tweak Gabor's work on translation strings (.hxx, .hrc)[1] Not sure if the new gradients need any attention. =-ref-= [1] <a href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/41330">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/41330</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>