<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - New standard palette: names of purple and violet are switched" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114719#c14">Comment # 14</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - New standard palette: names of purple and violet are switched" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114719">bug 114719</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tietze.heiko@gmail.com" title="Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com>"> Heiko Tietze</a> <pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=114719#c11">comment #11</a>) > Created <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=138758" name="attach_138758" title="RYB color palette generated with Gossett & Chen, and correctly assigning RYB Primary, RYB Secondary and traditional Tertiary names">attachment 138758</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=138758&action=edit" title="RYB color palette generated with Gossett & Chen, and correctly assigning RYB Primary, RYB Secondary and traditional Tertiary names">[details]</a> Not bad but I prefer our coverage of red as Vermillion and Red are very close compared to Brick vs. Red. And the hue variation in the lower light area (light 2 and 1 to dark 1) is also quite small. If we change the color palette again, all subsidiary patches have to be redone. For example the patch for gradients, which is still pending a review (<a href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/46428/">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/46428/</a>), makes no sense with different color values. Even worse when we would have started to update the Sky Tango Blue to whatever transition for the hard-coded values. I still wonder what arguments speak against just swapping the color names.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>