<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - UI: Opening the new "navigate by" for choosing the object to go back&forth opens the "big" navigation window, too" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79167#c41">Comment # 41</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - UI: Opening the new "navigate by" for choosing the object to go back&forth opens the "big" navigation window, too" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79167">bug 79167</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:gautier.sophie@gmail.com" title="sophie <gautier.sophie@gmail.com>"> sophie</a> <pre>(In reply to Harald Koester from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=79167#c40">comment #40</a>) > I checked the new drop down menu (Ver. 6.0.0.3, Win 10). 2 Comments: > > (1) If you search for a previous or next item and the item does not exist, > there is no error message. I would expect a message similar, if a search > string is not found ("Search key not found"). Write new bug report? As this is a navigation drop down, I wouldn't expect an error message, but that could be an enhancement :) > > (2) If you perform a normal find text operation, the object type of the new > drop down menu is switched to "Repeat search". This is a bit awkward, if you > always have to switch back to the original object type. To my opinion the > item "Repeat search" can be omitted in the new menu, because all searches > can be done with the drop down menu for searches. Agreed there, I wouldn't expect the 'navigate by' to be changed, could you also open a bug for that? Thanks! Sophie</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>