<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - "Zero Width Non Joiner" does not specify a word end if input via the keyboard"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115050#c16">Comment # 16</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - "Zero Width Non Joiner" does not specify a word end if input via the keyboard"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115050">bug 115050</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:khaledhosny@eglug.org" title="Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org>"> <span class="fn">Khaled Hosny</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Patrick Schönbach from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=115050#c15">comment #15</a>)
<span class="quote">> Why is there a "Zero Width Non Joiner" and a "Zero Width Joiner" if the
> "Zero Width Non Joiner" would have no inherent non joining functionality and
> the non joining would have to be implemented by every OT font on its own?
> This doesn't make sense.</span >
Please consult the relevant part The Unicode Standard, namely §32.2 Cursive
Connection and Ligatures;
<a href="http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode10.0.0/ch23.pdf#G23126">http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode10.0.0/ch23.pdf#G23126</a>), and UAX#29
Unicode Text Segmentation;
<a href="http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/#Word_Boundary_Rules">http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/#Word_Boundary_Rules</a>.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>