<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - SIDEBAR: Panel's minimum width can be circumvented making the panel unusable." href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115981#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - SIDEBAR: Panel's minimum width can be circumvented making the panel unusable." href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115981">bug 115981</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> Telesto</a> <pre>This is in essence a dupe of <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - SIDEBAR: Having the sidebar with a fixed width across all tabs" href="show_bug.cgi?id=90374">bug 90374</a>; it describes the same issue. If the issue is present as problem (<a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - SIDEBAR: Having the sidebar with a fixed width across all tabs" href="show_bug.cgi?id=90374">bug 90374</a>) or solution (enhancement, <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=115981#c7">comment 7</a>) doesn't matter. I personally agree with Luke, it's a bug. A minor one though. Different minimum sizes is unexpected and counter-intuitive for the basic - regular? - user (surprise effect). -- Some basic question in advance (which someone should answer first) * Why are there minimum deck size? -> * Why a the minimum/maximum sizes of the decks a shared setting? -> Visual consistency? -- Personal opinion: -> It's illogical: if we acknowledge the need for minimum sizes, then we should respect them in any case. No circumventions.. -> It's Inconsequent (no unity): All decks look the same, some should behave the same -> It's unfunctional: I would expect a deck to be functional when switching decks -> It's visually annoying if every deck had a own size setting. A small size will render some decks unusable, a larger size doesn't hurt. Based on consistency I would like a global default minimum size, where all the decks are fully functional. I understand that there are some user cases, for shrinking the deck below the "global" minimum. Which sounds a bit like special user needs (my opinion; no workflow expert). A possible solution would be to 'set a default minimum size' which can be bypassed. Something like CTRL+DRAG for people who really want that to happen...</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>