<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Style names become invisible if the default style used white color" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115507#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Style names become invisible if the default style used white color" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115507">bug 115507</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de" title="Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>"> Ulrich Windl</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=115507#c7">comment #7</a>) [...] > 4) since using a white font on white background (or vice versa) has been > done intentionally by the user. The alternative is to highlight the [...] If you read <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=115507#c0">comment 0</a> again, you will find that the user created a white font on a black background, not "white on white" as you claim. Also, as pointed out in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=115507#c2">comment 2</a>, the assumption that the color of paper is white may be wrong. On some printers that can feature a page watermark on the background, you clearly see where writer keeps the "transparent page background" (where the watermark "shined through" and where it fills the area with white (Where "paper without watermark shined through"). Also pointed out in the same comment, there was a proposal for assuming a transparent background (unless the page fill color is explicitly set), and reflecting that in the background of the style preview.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>