<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Allow more font and position formatting for watermarks" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115737#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Allow more font and position formatting for watermarks" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115737">bug 115737</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:thomas.lendo@gmail.com" title="Thomas Lendo <thomas.lendo@gmail.com>"> Thomas Lendo</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=115737#c5">comment #5</a>) > I wouldn't put much effort in this feature as there are alternative ways Someone who has the rights can lower the importance (instead of "medium" now). This would reflect the interest on it for Heiko and maybe Szymon. But I wouldn't close this bug neither as WFM nor as WONTFIX. What's not important for someone can be important for another one. (My 2 cents: Closing this bug wouldn't enforce developers to work on other bugs if they're interested especially in watermark feature.) > By the way, Insert > Watermark has not made it into 5.4/6.1 and is > suboptimal placed there because you also _edit_ the watermark. It could be > placed at the TSCP toolbar or ideally made available at Format > Page. => NEW Watermark feature is already available via 'Format > Watermark...' in 5.4, 6.0 and 6.1. Enhancement request for importing into page dialog see <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FORMATTING: Watermark feature in page style dialog" href="show_bug.cgi?id=107996">bug 107996</a>. > And last but not least it is not documented. => NEW <a href="https://help.libreoffice.org/6.1/en-US/text/swriter/01/watermark.html">https://help.libreoffice.org/6.1/en-US/text/swriter/01/watermark.html</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>