<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Arabic Letter Heh (ه) is render incorrectly when isolated" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114740#c10">Comment # 10</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Arabic Letter Heh (ه) is render incorrectly when isolated" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114740">bug 114740</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:khaledhosny@eglug.org" title="Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org>"> Khaled Hosny</a> <pre>(In reply to antanins from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=114740#c9">comment #9</a>) > I beg your pardon. However, the bug status appears not as UNCONFIRMED but as > RESOLVED NOTABUG (without much discussion, by the way). Much as we may agree > this is a font issue, it is somehow paradoxical, however, from a standard > user point of view, that previous versions were wrong in making these fonts > behave "better" (i.e., as expected). That is how the font is designed; an isolated heh takes a هـ form not ه form. There is no better or worse here; there is rendering the font as intended by its designer (current) and not doing that (previous). If you don’t like the font behavior 1) contact the vendor and ask for the font to be changed 2) change the font yourself (if you are legally allowed of course) 3) use a different font. Please understand that we can’t just “fix” this issue, what you see as a bug others might see as a feature, and the litmus test is whether we are rendering the font as intended or not.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>