<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> changed <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - installing 5.4.5.1 completely messed up typeface and lines in a document just created" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116664">bug 116664</a> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <th>What</th> <th>Removed</th> <th>Added</th> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:right;">CC</td> <td> </td> <td>rb.henschel@t-online.de </td> </tr></table> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - installing 5.4.5.1 completely messed up typeface and lines in a document just created" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116664#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - installing 5.4.5.1 completely messed up typeface and lines in a document just created" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116664">bug 116664</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>(In reply to David Edwards from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=116664#c8">comment #8</a>) > Thanks for this. It looks as if the end of your remarks was lost. > Its just the link to the first pdf attachment with the screen clips. > Does what you say mean that I have to revert to an even earlier version of > LO and stay with it or have to manually reformat everything that is in Times > Roman? It is a very commonly used font and I will be perpetually annoyed if > the LO/Win 10 64 combination alters it all to the horrible Liberation Serif. > Out of interest, is the 'fault' (and in consequence I suppose the remedy) > with Windows or LO? No, Liberation Serif is metric equivalent to Times New Roman, while Liberation Sans is metric equivalent to Arial. The issue looks to be in the styles applied to the ODF documents--they were incomplete and so LibreOFfice defaults get applied. <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140921" name="attach_140921" title="report which still needs some correcting in 5.3.3.2">attachment 140921</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140921&action=edit" title="report which still needs some correcting in 5.3.3.2">[details]</a> shows meta as authored with LibreOffice/5.2.7.2$Windows_X86_64 <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140920" name="attach_140920" title="report which opens correctly in 5.3.3.2">attachment 140920</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140920&action=edit" title="report which opens correctly in 5.3.3.2">[details]</a> shows meta as authored with LibreOffice/5.3.3.2$Windows_X86_64 So, suspect problem predates these builds of LibreOffice and these versions of the file "reports". One more sage with replacing ODF styles would need to comment (Regina?), but believe issue is that there is no font assignment to the "Police_20_par_20_défaut" and "Internet_20_link" styles across multiple text spans in the content, you pick up current LO defaults. I think we would probably need even older versions of the files to see what the original style specified for font. Then in Writer (or other affected module) use Tools -> Options -> LibreOffice Writer: Basic Fonts (Western) dialog to adjust the defaults. Pick a better font (old bitmap fonts like "roman", or PostScript Type 1 fonts if installed will not show on the list box) that renders the reports without too much distortion. Going forward, work up a better Style to apply to the paragraphs of the reports.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>