<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Tango shouldnt be falling back on Colibre"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118123#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Tango shouldnt be falling back on Colibre"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118123">bug 118123</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> <span class="fn">V Stuart Foote</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Hmmm, not sure I follow your reasoning Andreas? In <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - Update the fallback strategy and replace Galaxy by Colibre"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=116696">bug 116696</a> cmnt 10 you agree
the replacement of Galaxy by Colibre offers complete coverage--so Galaxy should
go. Admittedly the 3D Tango styling is rather off the design aesthetic of
Colibre, but so?
As long as there is full icon coverage--what difference does the fall back
make? Here it just points out how incomplete Tango by itself is.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>