<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sarti_carlo@yahoo.com" title="sarti_carlo@yahoo.com <sarti_carlo@yahoo.com>"> <span class="fn">sarti_carlo@yahoo.com</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Severe bug in LibreOffice (Calc Speadsheet)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117049">bug 117049</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Ever confirmed</td>
<td>1
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEEDINFO
</td>
<td>UNCONFIRMED
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Severe bug in LibreOffice (Calc Speadsheet)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117049#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Severe bug in LibreOffice (Calc Speadsheet)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117049">bug 117049</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sarti_carlo@yahoo.com" title="sarti_carlo@yahoo.com <sarti_carlo@yahoo.com>"> <span class="fn">sarti_carlo@yahoo.com</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I don't understand the status change done by <a href="mailto:jbfaure@libreoffice.org">jbfaure@libreoffice.org</a> and
<a href="mailto:miguelangelrv@liber.org">miguelangelrv@liber.org</a>.
Your <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=117049#c9">comment #9</a> is following to mine (#7 and 8).
<a href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com">mikekaganski@hotmail.com</a> wrote, in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=117049#c1">comment #1</a>, "I do reproduce the described
behavior".
m.a.riosv, you made a "crap" to change my bug as "RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug
114482".
Please, stop to do other changes.
Mike Kaganski wrote , in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=117049#c1">comment #1</a>, "but I can't confirm the bug because I
don't know if it's actually a bug … Calc experts may have a different opinion
here, and correct me. For that reason, I add Eike Rathke to the CC".
Eike Rathke, are you an Calc expert? have you done anything?
If you are not sure if the described behavior is a bug, you mast change work.
The agricolture offers many opportunities.
In any case, all you must read my comments #7 and 8. I explain because it is a
bug. I explain, mathematically speaking, what means to do B1=B1+A1 (one time),
starting from B1=0 and A1=100.
Furthermore, I add the use for piggy bank, as use of circular references with
Steps (first parameter in Iterations) set to 1.
Excuse me, if I, at the end of <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=117049#c8">comment #8</a>, joked writing "Have I invented a new
technique? Must I patent it? I don't think", for the use as continued addition.
After having added new info (comments #7 and 8), I changed the status from
NEEDINFO to UNCONFIRMED, as suggested by the system.
I will change again the Status to UNCONFIRMED.
Who has to make a decision to solve this stupid bug?
I thing that UBUNTU must replace Libre with SoftMaker. In these days, this
society released "free office 2018".
Best regards
Carlo Sarti</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>