<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Image caption, inconsistency: caption for images is now "figure" and no longer "illustration""
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119738#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Image caption, inconsistency: caption for images is now "figure" and no longer "illustration""
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119738">bug 119738</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tietze.heiko@gmail.com" title="Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Heiko Tietze</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to BogdanB from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=119738#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> It's just a problem of numbering. You have Figure 1, than Ilustration 1,
> than Figure 2, than Ilustration 2, depending what version of LO we use for
> inserting Figure or Ilustration.</span >
Sure, but what options do we have? I'm strongly against reverting as Figure is
the standard term used in scientific publications. Adding some code to check
what caption has been used in the current document? Difficult since you
intentionally can have both Illustration and Figure. So I vote for the third
door with the zonk. Meaning you have to be careful and change the caption in
non-standard documents.
Besides I wonder why you accepted Illustration as caption. Wouldn't it make
more sense to switch those labels to Figure?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>