<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Return object Name and Description dialog buttons to object context menus" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101193#c25">Comment # 25</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Return object Name and Description dialog buttons to object context menus" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101193">bug 101193</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>(In reply to Cor Nouws from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101193#c23">comment #23</a>) > > Is that so? I thought we could add to context menu what we have. And improve > later. > Don't let the better be the enemy of the good :) Guess that remains your position as in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101193#c15">comment 15</a>--but as noted we provide ability to customize the context menu to add the controls--none the less the place to correctly fix this is exposing a properties dialog common to all objects. (In reply to andreas_k from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101193#c24">comment #24</a>) > cause I can't finish the context menu patches without this feetback. I don't > care about yes or no. I need your feedback and which option the most +1 get > will go to master. > None! forget doing the context menu piecemeal. Resolve the properties dialog and add that to the context menu in a consistent fashion. > fyi in 6.1 writer name and description are available in > 3. media > 5. form And should be removed</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>