<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - When importing media (eg images) to libreoffice it would be friendly to save some metadata"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119563#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - When importing media (eg images) to libreoffice it would be friendly to save some metadata"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119563">bug 119563</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tietze.heiko@gmail.com" title="Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Heiko Tietze</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Some info might be useful and is shown anyway with the image. Following [1]
interoperability keywords are
* keywords
* description
* date and time*
* orientation
* rating
* copyright*
* creator*
* location created
* location shown
where those with asterisks seems most important to me (exif [2] has much more
info) plus file name, which is not part of the digital still image meta data
but in the more general definition [3]
* Means of creation of the data
* Purpose of the data
* Time and date of creation*
* Creator or author of the data*
* Location on a computer network where the data was created*
* Standards used
* File size
* Data quality
* Source of the data*
* Process used to create the data
Not an easy topic.
[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata_Working_Group">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata_Working_Group</a>
[2] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exif">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exif</a>
[3] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata#Definition">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata#Definition</a></pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>