<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - In the Libre~Calc; cell-format; line; specifying the Dotted Line causes the Dot-Dash Line." href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121153#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - In the Libre~Calc; cell-format; line; specifying the Dotted Line causes the Dot-Dash Line." href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121153">bug 121153</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:aataka8@gmail.com" title="千田 <aataka8@gmail.com>"> 千田</a> <pre>Created <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=146516" name="attach_146516" title="Trying with the Calc ver.6.1.3.2 draws Dashed-Line, not the Dotted-Line.">attachment 146516</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=146516&action=edit" title="Trying with the Calc ver.6.1.3.2 draws Dashed-Line, not the Dotted-Line.">[details]</a> Trying with the Calc ver.6.1.3.2 draws Dashed-Line, not the Dotted-Line. Thank you for the kind reply, and I'm sorry for late to reply back. (I spent the time by facing to the another torouble about the macro-button, and have been away from the mails.) I thought that I had seen the Dotted-Line in the very old version. I found that the meaning of the Dotted-Line sometimes includes the Dashed-Line, by the internet dictionary. If you make the spec. of the Line-type so, it's all right. It gives the Calc the rich expressive force to add the dot-dot-...-Line to the Line-types, I think and recommend. (I wish I could help to edit the sources.) Anyway, I'll use the short-Dashed-Line for the weak separators. Thank you very much for your time.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>