<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FORECAST.ETS.PI functions produces different results with identical data." href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121396#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FORECAST.ETS.PI functions produces different results with identical data." href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121396">bug 121396</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:winfrieddonkers@libreoffice.org" title="Winfried Donkers <winfrieddonkers@libreoffice.org>"> Winfried Donkers</a> <pre>Created <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=146625" name="attach_146625" title="document used for testing">attachment 146625</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=146625&action=edit" title="document used for testing">[details]</a> document used for testing I have not yet been able to reproduce a crash with the attached document, neither with direct (re)calculation (single cells and groups of cells) nor with the function wizard. The attached document is an extended version of the original attachment. I tried 2 computers, 1 with current master, 1 with version 6.0.5.2. Both computers have openSUSE Leap 15. I will try tomorrow on a Windows computer. A note on the document in the attachment: with a data set of 5 samples and a prediction that is 6 steps away from the latest sample (daily values from 10 to 14 May and a prediction for 20 May) the results are way out of reality from a statistical point of view. Also, the data set does not contain at least 2 complete periods, which is needed for ETS. This should not influence the stability of the calculations, it's just that the results are useless.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>